Madisons views in the structure of the proposed constitution Research Paper

Madisons views in the structure of the proposed constitution - Research Paper Example Madison asserted that the republican remedy personified in the Constitution permitted the different sections adequate room to articulate their outlooks and to attempt to pressure the government. Rather than the majority suppressing minorities, the diverse concerns would confer their differences. This leads to a situation whereby the majority would rule but with appropriate care and consideration given to minorities. Consequently, the same number of sections would prevent any one from exerting dictatorial power over the rest (Federalist no. 10). He also argued that there must be a connection between the interests of the man and the constitutional rights of the place. He feels that when such tools are crucial to contain the exploitations of government, it becomes an expression on human nature. For instance, he argues that there would be no need of a government if men were angels. Moreover, neither peripheral nor interior pressures on government would be obligatory if angels were to rul e men. A great complexity lies in structuring a government, to be governed by men over men. In this regard, one must first facilitate the government to have power over the governed and in the next place compel it to govern itself. The major control on the government is a dependence on the citizens. However, experience has taught people the requisite of supplementary safety measures.He further indicates that if a section consists of less than a majority, the republican principle relieves it by enabling the majority to overcome its menacing views by standard vote. It might convulse the humanity and obstruct the administration. However, under the provisions of the Constitution, it will be incapable of carrying out and masking its brutality. When a majority comprises a faction, the structure of popular government, alternatively allows it to surrender to its ruling zeal or concern both the rights of other citizens and the public good. The greatest objective of the constitution is to prot ect the public good and personal rights from the threat of such a faction as well as to safeguard the spirit and the structure of popular government (Federalist no. 10). Moreover, diverse interests unavoidably subsist in different categories of citizens. The privileges of the marginalized would be in danger if a majority were in unity due to a common interest. This can be counteracted by realizing several divided depictions of citizens in the society. In effect, this will leave an unfair combination of a majority very dubious and impossible. The federal republic of the United States will illustrate this method in the proposed constitution. All power in it will originate from and rely on the society and the society itself will have numerous interests, divisions, and categories of citizens. Consequently, the rights of marginalized, or of the minority, will be less vulnerable from interested groupings of the majority. Madison further argues that, the safety for civil rights must be equ ivalent to that for religious rights in a liberated government. In the one case, it comprises the array of interests and the diversity of factions in the other (Federalist no. 51). Madison further argues that to facilitate guarding against the factions of a few, delegates must increase to a certain number however small the republic might be. In addition, to guard against the perplexity of a crowd, the delegates must be limited to a certain number however large it might be. The number of delegates in the two scenarios is comparatively greater in the small republic hence is not corresponding to that of the two components. In that case, the larger republic will offer a larger preference, and therefore a greater likelihood of a fit choice. Consequently, more citizens in the large than in the small republic will select each delegate. For that reason, it will be very hard for undeserving candidates to practice successfully the nasty arts, which often

Compare and contrast the various diagramming techniques used in UML2.0 Essay

Compare and contrast the various diagramming techniques used in UML2.0 - Essay Example UML2.0 is a version of Unified modeling Language which is was develops to use graphic notations and modeling techniques to develop various visual models that are built and applied within systems to facilitate business activities. This paper gives a critical analysis, discussion and comparison of the various diagramming techniques and how they are used within UML2.0 to design and model systems. The various diagraming techniques are explained through illustrations or examples to demonstrate their similarities and differences. There are two major categories of diagrams in the UML2.0 system design and modeling techniques. These are structure and behavior diagrams which represent structural information and behavior of systems respectively. In each of the two major UML2.0 diagraming techniques are seven diagrams which represent various aspects of systems. Therefore, there is a total of fourteen diagrams which are used in the design and modeling techniques of UML2.0. Figure 1 below represen ts an overview of the two categories of diagrams which the UML2.0 design and modeling techniques employs to develop visual systems2. Figure 1: UML2.0 Diagramming All the diagrams under structural diagraming techniques of UML2.0 are similar in the fact that they all represent structural information. ... However, four of the behavior diagrams are used to depict the interactions which exist among different systems. The common similarity of the UML diagrams in system design and modeling is the elements which they contain. In UML2.0 based design and modeling, the elements of a system are depicted in the diagram in defining the structure and model of the system as a whole3. The elements which are composed in the UML2.0 diagramming include actors, business activities, business processes, UML statements, database schemas, software components and logical components. Each of the elements of UML2.0 diagramming plays different roles in communicating the structure and design of the system model. In addition the diagrams within the UML.0 diagramming are basically used to visualize what the system will look like in real application after it has been constructed or installed. Through these diagrams, the required modifications to systems are explained and designed. This is because of the common fea ture of UML2.0 diagramming which ensures that standards are used to specify the details of design and structure of various systems. The diagrams used in UML2.0 mediated system design and modeling are aimed at ensuring the efficiency and effectiveness of systems is ascertained before they are actually built or constructed. The diagrams used in UML2.0 mediated system design and modeling are also similar in the fact that they combine different techniques in achieving the desired design and models of systems. The techniques which are employed by the UML2.0 diagraming techniques include data and business modeling. Entity relationship diagrams are specifically employed in data modeling within the